<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Kasey's blog - Latest Comments in In Defense of jQuery - Issac Kelly</title><link>http://servee.disqus.com/</link><description>Kasey's design blog</description><atom:link href="https://servee.disqus.com/in_defense_of_jquery_issac_kelly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:37:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: In Defense of jQuery - Issac Kelly</title><link>http://www.issackelly.com/Blog/entry/In_Defense_of_jQuery/#comment-2819448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Tom.  I 100% agree with you. While I do think that jQuery is better, a number of things on the list had to do with personal preference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other libraries have their place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">issackelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Defense of jQuery - Issac Kelly</title><link>http://www.issackelly.com/Blog/entry/In_Defense_of_jQuery/#comment-2817513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's important for everyone to remember, the JavaScript libraries and frameworks aren't competing... We aren't at war with each other, we are all collectively at war against browser inconsistencies, and limitations of the JavaScript language itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since all the framework authors understand this, I think it's important for us to start conveying to our users how important it is for them to understand it as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Occhino</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:42:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>